Looking Back and Looking Forward

When I began this blog in earnest back in January of 2011, my general goals were to share my decades-long journey of personal development, to express what I had learned while researching the nature of the events which occurred in my youth, and to invite my readers to join me in considering some of the avenues of investigation, which I pursued while searching for a path that might lead to a greater understanding of the subjective human experience of consciousness. I am convinced now that the ultimate explanation must go much deeper and be more meaningful and profound than most modern investigators suppose. It is one of the central questions being investigated at the forefront of philosophy generally, and in neuroscience specifically, and there are a number of scholars and other seekers actively searching with equal enthusiasm.

Just as it seems very clear to me now that the physical universe in which we exist, the “material world,” appears to be a manifestation of something that is not material, so too now does consciousness appear to be, at its source, non-material. In saying this I am not suggesting that it is without interaction with the physical world, but rather that its origin, where it stems from, what precisely emerges from Life, goes much deeper—it transcends all that we know intellectually and what we experience sensually.

What has compelled me to pursue it all along has been my own profound sense of something other than the physical world at work in my own experience of existence, and to the extent that I have studied the material sciences, the laws of physics, and listened to the conclusions and musings of the great thinkers across the history of humanity, I know that my own personal experiences of awareness—my own consciousness, is the most vitally important source of information that I could possibly hope to encounter. Balanced against a reasonable and rational science of brain physiology, and in consideration of the great strides we have made in psychology and in working through the philosophical discourse by thinkers and scholars from all over the world, what has transpired within me rings true with both the material and non-material aspects of my experience of existence.

After decades of life spent searching, I have gradually increased my confidence in the validity of those aspects of my experience of the world, which are not visible, not temporal in their nature in the strictest sense, but rather part of an eruption of sorts into the physical. Everything I see, and all the research, reading, and contemplation that has accompanied my efforts to come to terms with many of the events of my life, confirm for me the general notion that I have carried with me my whole life—and that is—every aspect of our physical lives, every nuance of experience, is made possible by a source which cannot be defined well in material terms.

Even when I have been disappointed or saddened or felt a sense of loss for any reason, I still felt close to this non-material source, just as I do in moments of great joy and elation, and during moments of what one might wish to describe as revelation—not in the biblical or religious sense—but rather, as life revealing itself to me in my experience of it.

Recently, interactions with my fellow human beings have become more pronounced in the differences between those who are open to the spirit of life—those within whom the “human spirit” radiates—with those who are less in touch with the core elements of their humanity; the ineffable, the non-physical, or the “spiritual,” if you will. Encountering individuals who embody the radiance of spirit, even if they don’t recognize it themselves, make this pursuit worthwhile, and those who are lacking in their understanding or who haven’t experienced their inner world well, make the expression of my ideas even more compelling.

In particular, when I encounter people with whom I feel an especially powerful connection, which is occasionally so clear and so deeply affective, sometimes even after only a few minutes, it increases my sensitivity to that connection in a “spiritual,” ineffable, and unambiguous way. The struggle that I have often had and continue to have from long ago is figuring out a way to alert these individuals to these connections, and to share my urgent sense of connection to them, without intruding or pressing the issue beyond a reasonable degree.

At least at present, it seems impossible for me to separate myself from my awareness of these connections, which are, to me, so obvious; I sometimes sense them so strongly, that any attempt to ignore them or to dismiss them as belonging to some biological or instinctive process simply makes no sense. During certain encounters over the years, even when there wasn’t any particularly overt cause to explain the connection, even then, the particulars often seemed to lead to the non-material. It often prompted me to consider that energies outside of our physical beings or even within us might be responsible.

In fact, when it comes to these dual aspects of our humanity, there truly is no “inside of us” or “outside of us,” in any meaningful sense. It is simply a necessary linguistic compromise to distinguish in some way, the material from the non-material, and describing them in that way helps us to realize that both are essential to life, and integral to comprehending the ineffable nature of our subjective experience. When we fall in love or feel strongly compelled toward certain ideas or individuals, or when we seek to participate in certain compelling circumstances, even when we occasionally become obsessed by these ideas, all of these are indications of a combination or coordination between these dual aspects.

Since it seems to me that we are both physical beings with powerful instinctive, biological, and psychological drives, as well as spiritual beings with a number of equally potent intuitive inclinations, it often may seem easier to focus primarily on explaining our experiences as being the result of brain activity, and to insist that those physiological processes are the source of all our inclinations, as opposed to including the possibility that any other non-material source might be at work.

I am firmly convinced that the mechanisms of cognition, intelligence, and brain functions, so vital to our ability to make sense of the world, simply cannot constitute the whole explanation. We see great strides being made with artificial intelligence, and with the efforts to replicate the functioning of neural processes artificially, and while these endeavors are truly fascinating and worthwhile, they cannot compare in significance to the richly-textured and deeply personal inner subjective experience of human consciousness, which has thus far only been possible to confirm subjectively, as to its capacity to exercise influence on our temporal circumstances.


As I progressed in my research and study of subjective experience, I began to see parallels to many of the descriptions in the literature and scholarship on the subject, over centuries of human endeavor, with my own experiences. When certain events occurred in my early life, I was painfully unaware of what might explain them or help me to understand them better, but now, having become aware of the broad range of thought and theory contained in the history of humanity, and having decades of personal experience to reflect upon, I have been able to associate some of their core findings with my own experiences. Whether or not I have been expressing the conclusions reached by that study in a coherent manner, making them accessible to a wider range of people may be an open question, but doing so has been my goal.

While many of those who ponder these important issues are unwilling to suppose or unable to discern how any influence or energy which has no clearly empirical explanation might be active within and essential to life, for myself, I have to believe that what has been burning within me for so long, and occupied nearly every mental effort I could muster along the way, has been a sufficient cause to express its urgency in my writings.

Considering the wide range of my experiences, both sensual and spiritual, my sincere conviction now is that what I feel, what I sense, and what I experience, not only internally and personally, but also as an observer of the world “outside of me,” especially in consideration of the responses of other individuals under extraordinary circumstances, is that I cannot dismiss out of hand, any experience or conclusion that occurs within me.

In calling my blog, “John’s Consciousness,” I don’t remember thinking too long about it, but when I first saw it on the masthead here, I immediately accepted it as the right choice, in spite of the fact that I wasn’t completely clear in my own mind if it would accurately describe the content I was about to explore in these pages. There is no question in my mind at this point that the ineffable nature of consciousness and the complex machinations of brain physiology, supported by multi-faceted sensory input which support subjective experience, are intimately intertwined, not because there is some direct link discernible to science or immediately obvious to others, but because in my personal experience it has been so. Since it has been so in that way, I feel confident in saying that I have learned to distinguish between those ideas and experiences which are mostly peripheral and those which are profound, and part of the core components of my life.

I have dedicated much of my time and pressed myself to persist in my efforts with great determination to create and present thoughtful, rational, and sincere entries here, and to share my ideas with clarity and balanced argumentation. It is clear from the many insightful responses I have received over the years that certain entries have resonated with my readers more than others, and while I have been formulating these ideas ever since I was a much younger person, even now, as a mature man with sixty-plus years on this planet, I must acknowledge that I am still hampered to some degree by my cultural and familial conditioning, even as I attempt to express what is most urgent within me.

There is so much more to discover. I am compelled to persist in my efforts to dig deeper, and to continue to write about what has been revealed by my decades of searching.

5 thoughts on “Looking Back and Looking Forward

  1. Great post John and loving the Bitmojis. Do you have any thoughts on the true origins of human consciousness and when we became “aware”?

    It is said by some that we were not truly conscious until language was matured enough so that we could explore our inner thoughts more deeply through the eclectic mix of diction (metaphors/concepts) and the advent of science principles which led to the breakdown of the bicameral mind and the creation of “true consciousness”?

    1. Thanks for your comment, Mike, and for your very important question regarding the origins of human consciousness. I am familiar with the research you cite which posits that humans only became truly conscious when our competence with language matured sufficiently, and with the fascinating work done by Julian Jaynes surrounding the concept of a “bicameral mind.” The story of human consciousness is complex to be sure, and the pathways of our biological evolution and human development through cultural and psychological blossoming are as diverse and wondrous as any other in the development of life on our planet. We cannot minimize the significance of any of these important human developments when considering the subject of human consciousness, and the science of the brain, and the research and study of our cognitive systems over hundreds of years shows just how important all of the factors which contributed to our awakening to our keen sense of awareness have been.

      From my perspective, there is a very important distinction between simply “being conscious,” and the totality of the phenomenon of human consciousness itself. As I see it, consciousness exists now and has existed always as a fundamental feature of existence in the physical universe, because the Universe itself is a manifestation of a fundamental energy which brought it into existence, and all life wherever it exists possesses some degree of or capacity for consciousness. What we see in the evolution of Homo Sapiens is an ever-increasing mental capacity as our brain architecture became more complex, and a gradual sophistication of our cognitive abilities, based on our cultural and psychological development. At some point, all of these factors coalesced in our species sufficiently to begin the awakening of a fuller and richer experience of consciousness. It was a gradual awakening with periods of advancement and retreat, and those who suggest that being “truly conscious,” required a degree of sophistication and utility with language have a strong case. Most every culture on the planet did not immediately develop a grammatical language. Most often the initial offerings with language were symbolic or pictographic like cuneiform and hieroglyphics, and while these initial offerings were a step along the way, bearing witness to an increased awareness, a fully functional degree of conscious awareness, it could be argued, did not take place until humans were adequately equipped linguistically.

      The premise I have been working with here at “John’s Consciousness,” posits that the richly-textured subjective experience of human consciousness is a holistic and multi-layered conglomeration of phenomenal and spiritual energies, and cannot be comprehensively explained through only the sciences and the complexities of human culture and psychology. Even if our development was marked by progressive steps which included the transformation of a bicameral mind into our modern 21st century version, human consciousness is much more than “being conscious,” and figuring out just when we became “aware” may be debatable, and all the particulars of our physical and cognitive development clearly should be examined and studied, but human consciousness is fundamental and involves much more than brain science.

    1. Thanks for your visit and your comment, Keith. Your estimation of the amount of time for science to “catch up,” especially with consciousness, seems right in the sense that it likely won’t ever do so in a way that will be useful to humanity as we know it. Consciousness exists well beyond the parameters of science and temporal existence, and is made manifest in the temporal realm in a manner and through a process that is not now amenable to empirical methodology, and unlikely to yield its secrets in that way.

      I am familiar with Michio Kaku’s ideas about the eventual digitalization of all that we are–our lives and memories and experiences combined with some form of holographic reproduction of us that our descendants may be able to interact with as if we were still alive, and while that also seems like scientific slight-of-hand, the true nature of our subjective experience of consciousness is also non-material at its source, in my view, and our existence may one day transition into something totally unrecognizable as being human in the way we understand it today.

      I spent some time browsing through the offerings at mysticexperiences.net today and can see that we have common grounds in some of our ideas. Looking forward to spending some more time there in the near future….John H.

      1. Yes, we have a lot of common ground John. I am enjoying your web pages as a new Follower. I am usually careful about what I read in case humanity distracts me so am finding your careful words so very validising and refreshing. Nice to feel the rare, authentic kindredness. I am grateful.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s